Hiring an OKR consultant is rarely about curiosity.
It usually follows a period of frustration – OKRs exist, but execution hasn’t improved, alignment feels fragile, or leadership discussions keep circling the same issues.
One of the biggest barriers to bringing in external support is uncertainty: What actually happens once an OKR consultant is involved?
The first 90 days are critical. Done well, they set the foundation for sustainable execution. Done poorly, they reinforce scepticism around OKRs altogether.
The early phase of OKR consulting is not about writing objectives.
It’s about understanding how the organisation actually operates.
During the first month, effective OKR consulting focuses on:
Leadership priorities and trade-offs
Existing planning and review rhythms
Where OKRs have helped – and where they’ve failed
Decision-making bottlenecks
Accountability gaps
This phase often surfaces misalignment that wasn’t visible internally. Not because leaders weren’t communicating – but because assumptions had gone untested.
The goal here is clarity, not speed.
Many OKR implementations fail because they move too fast.
Jumping straight into objective-setting without addressing leadership alignment usually leads to:
Vague or overloaded objectives
Key results that avoid real commitment
Teams interpreting priorities differently
Early disengagement
A good OKR consultant slows things down at the start to prevent months of rework later.
Once leadership alignment is established, the focus shifts to design and structure.
This stage typically includes:
Translating strategy into clear, testable objectives
Defining key results that measure outcomes, not effort
Aligning leadership and team-level OKRs
Establishing ownership and review cadence
The emphasis is always on usefulness. OKRs are designed to influence decisions and behaviour – not to satisfy a framework.
At this point, OKRs begin to feel practical rather than theoretical.
Without experienced guidance, organisations often:
Overcomplicate scoring
Create too many OKRs
Confuse alignment with consensus
Avoid hard trade-offs
An OKR consultant’s role here is to maintain focus and prevent OKRs from becoming noise.
The final phase of the first 90 days is where OKRs either stick – or start to fade.
This period focuses on:
Running effective OKR check-ins
Turning reviews into decision-making forums
Reinforcing accountability without micromanagement
Coaching leaders and managers on how to use OKRs daily
Preparing internal teams to take ownership
By this stage, OKRs should feel less like a new initiative and more like part of the organisation’s operating rhythm.
When OKR consulting is done well, leadership teams typically notice:
Clearer priorities and trade-offs
More focused conversations
Better alignment across teams
Faster decision-making
Reduced firefighting
The biggest shift is often cultural: OKRs become a tool for clarity, not control.
A common concern with external OKR consulting is reliance.
In reality, the purpose of the first 90 days is to:
Build internal capability
Establish sustainable habits
Transfer ownership back to leadership and teams
A strong OKR consultant works themselves out of a role – leaving behind systems that continue to function.
That’s normal.
OKRs surface issues that already exist – misalignment, unclear priorities, accountability gaps. The discomfort isn’t a sign of failure; it’s a sign the right conversations are finally happening.
The difference with experienced OKR consulting is that those conversations are structured, productive, and outcome-focused.
The first 90 days with an OKR consultant aren’t about perfection.
They’re about building clarity, discipline, and momentum – so OKRs stop being an initiative and start becoming an operating system.
If you’re exploring whether external support would help your organisation move from strategy to execution, you can learn more about our OKR consulting and coaching approach and then contact us to put a plan of action together.